Marc Andreessen: “My Prediction Is That The Libertarians ...
Marc Andreessen: “My Prediction Is That The Libertarians ...
Marc Andreessen on Cryptocurrency Crypto Currency News
A Marc Andreessen no le asustan las turbulencias de Bitcoin
Marc Andreessen: Why Bitcoin Matters : Bitcoin
Marc Andreessen Bitcoin 2017 CryptoCoins Info Club
List of Scott's most influential twitter followers
It seems like Scott/SSC has gotten much more mainstream recognition over the past year, so I was curious to know who the most influential SSC readers are now. Using twitter follower data for this isn't perfect (follower count is not a perfect proxy for influence, not all SSC readers follow the twitter account, etc.), but it's the best I could think of and I figured it would be a fun exercise regardless. As an aside, a few interesting stats I learned about Scott's twitter followers (scraped on 12/30/17):
Of the top 100 most-followed followers, the gender breakdown (by my count) is 82 men vs 8 women (along with 10 organization or anonymous accounts). Among the top 50, it's 43 men and 1 woman (Liv Boeree)
385 followers (2% of the total) have bios including either "bitcoin", "ethereum", "crypto" or "blockchain"
There are 67 followers whose bios include either "@Google", "@ Google", "at Google", or "Googler"
Note: When constructing the top 100 below, I excluded accounts that had extremely large Following counts, since I wanted the list to just consist of (likely) actual SSC readers. My exact rule was to exclude any account that follows >20K, include any that follows <10K, and include accounts in the 10K-20K range iff their following/follower ratio was less than 10% (this last condition was mostly just because I wanted to keep @pmarca on the list). Anyway, below is the top 100. I also constructed lists for Eliezer, Robin Hanson, and gwern, and I can post those in the comments if anyone's interested.
Editor-in-Chief, @FiveThirtyEight. Author, The Signal and the Noise (http://amzn.to/QdyFYV). Sports/politics/food geek.
Bitcoin will succeed, but without a political agenda.
Looking at this subreddit's frontpage, it seems like today is all about the bitcoin community. Over the last week I always wanted to speak out about something that bothers me with it, so why not join in on todays hot topic: the problems with the Bitcoin community? Here's my story: Two months ago, when I just started to learn about the mechanisms of Bitcoin, I - quite naively - posted this question on bitcoin. I was more or less told to do my homework and learn more about all ideas of Voluntarism, Anarcho Capitalism, Libertarianism, and so on. So I did. Extensively. But I'm still not convinced. In contrary, I think that if Bitcoin succeeds (I'm quite optimistic) it will only happen through major mass adoption and I henceforth believe that the ideological and political ideas that where a driving force in the beginning, will just become a background noise or a foot note in our history books at best. A few days ago, Hive Wallet was released and a couple of friends installed it on their laptops. They have no idea about the blockchain, how the bitcoin protocol works or what austrian economics are and guess what: they don't give a shit about it. What they saw, was a pretty neat and simple concept of sending money through the internet. And in my opinion, this is what counts for most of the people and what can make Bitcoin (or other Crypto Currencies) a big success. Marc Andreessen wrote one of the best articles about Bitcoin that I've read in the last weeks and I'm sure you've all seen it. I agree with pretty much every sentence in his commentary for the New York Times but it's last paragraph has to be highlighted.
"But I hope that I have given you a sense of the enormous promise of Bitcoin. Far from a mere libertarian fairy tale or a simple Silicon Valley exercise in hype, Bitcoin offers a sweeping vista of opportunity to reimagine how the financial system can and should work in the Internet era..."
tl;dr: You can be a fan of Bitcoin without hating the government and hate paying taxes. And chances are, that if Bitcoin succeeds, the majority will use it for practical not political reasons. On a personal note: I am from Europe and I understand that many of the die-hard Voluntarist-NonStatist-Libertarian-Bitcoin-Fans are from the US, just as a huge part of the Bitcoin Community is. Everything on here is very US focused but here is hoping, that a community that believes in the ideas of a global currency, will also be able to develop a more global and less self centered view. Peace!
"Libertarians and Governments will swap what they think about bitcoin, in future!"
This is the thread on bitcointalk.org about a comment from Marc Andreessen, "Anybody who thinks Bitcoin makes it easier to do transactions that aren't tracked by the government is 100 percent wrong. The transactions all happen in public view. Anybody can look at the entire ledger and verify who owns what. So if you're a law enforcement agency or an intelligence agency, this is a much easier way to track the flow of money than cash. So I think actually law enforcement and intelligence agencies are going to wind up being pro-Bitcoin, and libertarians are going to wind up being anti-Bitcoin." On Twitter I asked him, "If anonymity blacklist-proof features are built into the protocol or most wallets, will #libertarians go back to liking #Bitcoin?" His response, "Maybe, but a lot of the same data mining techniques that work on email and IP addresses also work on the blockchain.
In it he talks about how he had to face many critics in the early days of the Internet. Among their criticisms were:
It’s for nerds. “Fine, you nerds can do what you want but normal people are never going to use this thing.”
It’s completely decentralized, which means you can’t trust it. No business is ever going to do anything on it because businesses won’t work on an untrusted environment. There won’t ever be any e-commerce.
There will never be any internet payments. No one will put their credit card on the internet.
It’s an open-source kind of thing so there will be no Internet companies.
It’s got all these technical deficiencies. It’s slow. It’s unreliable. It doesn’t work right. When you do a search, sometimes you get an answer back and sometimes you don’t. Sometimes when you dial in you get a busy signal.
What happen if your ISP goes out of business? Then you can’t get back online.
Once you get on the internet, even assuming you get on the internet, there’s nothing to do. There’s no content. Time magazine isn’t online, he New York Times isn’t online. It’s just a bunch of nerd stuff.
I thought of some comments I often hear people make about Bitcoin. It can be hard to compare industries far into the growth stage of the business cycle to those still nascent. I thought I would see what these criticisms look like if they were spoken about Bitcoin.
It's for nerds. "It’s far too complex. Fine, you crypto-coders can do what you want but normal people find wallets way too complex and difficult to use. They are never going to use this thing.”
It’s completely decentralized, which means you can’t trust it. No business is ever going to do anything with Bitcoin because businesses won’t work on an untrusted environment. There won’t ever be any Bitcoin-based ecosystem.
There will never be any Bitcoin payments. No one will put their real money into Bitcoins because it is so unsafe. I also heard that it is for drugs and black market payments.
It’s an open-source kind of thing so there wont be any Bitcoin companies. Besides, if it is open source, how do you make money?
It’s got all these technical deficiencies. It’s slow. It’s unreliable. It doesn’t work right. I heard that it gets “hacked” a lot and your money isn’t safe in Bitcoin.
What happen if your Bitcoin Exchange goes out of business? I heard that Bitcoin was bankrupt with that company Mt.Gox. Then you can’t get your money back.
Once you get some Bitcoin, even assuming you figure out how to do cryptography, there’s nothing to buy with it. There’s no real stores that accept it. It is only a bunch of crypto-enthusiasts doing all sorts of crazy funding schemes that make no sense.
VCs not Investing in Blockchain: VC investment in blockchain and Bitcoin companies hit a new low in number of financed companies. While the total sum of investment was relatively high, half of it came from financial institutions and tech giants rather than VCs.
But Banks & Tech Corporations Do: Microsoft, Intel and Amazon, together with top financial institutions such as Bank of America and Citigroup are presenting new blockchain solutions to developers, but the VCs are still lagging behind them in terms of investment and involvement in the industry. Exceptions: Lightspeed, Union Square, and Andreessen Horowitz each hold an average of five portfolio companies in the blockchain and bitcoin space.
ICO Storm: ICOs are exploding, bringing in $1.73 billion dollars since the beginning of 2017, five times the total capital raised by ICOs by the end of 2016. Fight or Flight: VCs are afraid to jump into blockchain investment because of the competitive threat ICOs pose; because of heavy regulation, due to treating crypto tokens as securities; because of too many bankruptcies and too few success stories; inability to create monopolies; Blockchain’s lack of scalability; and because of the inability to separate Blockchain infrastructure from the shady aspects of Bitcoin. Blockchain technology has been a buzz word for quite some time, yet it is Terra Incognita for most industry leaders, and is a space that still suffers from underinvestment. As the black swan of the tech world, blockchain hasn’t managed to acquire the place other buzz-related technologies, such as self-driving cars or A.I., acquired long ago. Associated with the high volatility of Bitcoin, and some of the shady activities that have exploited the digital currency, blockchain is still raising too many question marks in the eyes of the VCs, the same people who usually pioneer investment in revolutionary innovations.
But there are other possible reasons for the lack of Blockchain support by VCs. A major force behind VC objection to blockchain technology is called ICO, or Initial Coin Offering. ICOs are a blockchain, token-based fundraising alternative that is quickly becoming popular, making VCs and their traditional, slow, and sometimes heavily taxing process completely redundant. ICOs not only simplify the investment process, but also provide ways for startups to share equity and other benefits with their investors, their users, suppliers, and the entire community around them. In that light, ICOs are filling the financing gap that VCs and other investors are leaving behind. So far, 2017 is the breakthrough year for ICOs as $1.73 billion has been raised by startups using token sales, and ICO fundraising is forecasted to reach $1.8 billion by October. Notable ICOs include those of Tezos ($208M), EOS.IO ($200M), Bancor ($153M), and Status ($95M), as well as about 60 token sales in total. Have the investors made a profit? It depends, but the total market cap for all Altcoins (Cryptocurrency excluding Bitcoin) has risen from $2.2B on January 1st to roughly $71B yesterday. This is an increase of over 3200%, so yes, some investors are definitely happy. For unbiased ICO reviews go to Coin.best. For unbiased research reports on startup companies go to Zirra But Blockchain technology extends way beyond ICOs and even digital coins. Leaving currency aside, blockchain turned out to be a viable system of value sharing with no need for a trusted third party, such as a bank, or any centralized system. Blockchain can be used as a trusted digital ledger for an infinite selection of applications: it can be used as the infrastructure of a digital wallet, a voting system, or a platform that authenticates identity, ownership or certification, or certifies the traces of a supply chain. Microsoft and Intel have developed their blockchain frameworks for enterprises and financial institutions such as Citigroup and Bank of America has been investing in blockchain startups. Yet VCs are not buying. Is it moral bias? Fear from the impact of ICOs? Seeing something the others don’t or simply “staying behind the curve”? It’s difficult to tell. Fact is, VCs are not aligning behind blockchain, leaving a vacuum that quickly fills up while posting possibly the biggest gamble for the future of their own ventures. How alienated are VCs from the blockchain industry? According to a recent study by CB Insights, traditional equity-based investment (non-ICO) in blockchain companies hit in the second quarter of 2017 their lowest point since 2013, to 16 financing rounds. However, these 16 rounds totaled in $232 million, which was actually as high as the entire VC investment in self driving cars in the entire first half of the year. But VCs were just a small part of that picture. Almost half ($107 million) of the VC-based quarterly funding for blockchain companies went to the banking consortium R3, which was actually funded by the largest financial institutions such as Bank of America, Citigroup, Barclays, Credit Suisse, HSBC and tech giants such as Intel. Another $40 million went to the Bitcoin-based digital wallet Blockchain, from cryptocurrency-oriented investors such as Digital Currency Group, and mainstream VCs such as Lightspeed and Mosaic. As the graph below shows, top VCs are hardly in the blockchain game, hesitant to invest in more than one or two companies per quarter altogether around blockchain technology. Only a portion invested in more than one company in the space in total. Notable VCs Lightspeed, Union Square, and Andreessen Horowitz each hold an average of five portfolio companies in the blockchain and bitcoin space. So, who are the most dedicated investors in bitcoin and blockchain technology? The leaders are cryptocurrency-dedicated funds and hedge funds such as Digital Currency Group, Blockchain Capital, Pantera, Fenbushi Capital and Future Perfect. They are joined by a small group of innovative VCs ,managed by partners who are keen to cryptocurrencies such as Marc Andreessen (Andreessen Horowitz), Fred Wilson (Union Square), and Tim Draper (Draper Associates). Blockchain is not waiting for VCs to enter the game. It is exploding. Here are 3 major signals for this: 1.ICOs are exploding: In the meantime, it seems like everyone but VCs have joined the blockchain party. The ICOs were the ones who took the bigger bulk of business press attention in the second quarter, raising about $750 million for 60 companies. However, VCs and other institutional investors were not among the investors, as long as ICOs are not regulated and are outside the charter of investment given to general partners by their limited partners. 2.Cryptocurrency, not just Bitcoin, is experiencing great momentum. The graph below tells the story. Bitcoin is barely the whole picture. Other blockchain-based cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum and Ripple are on the rise. This graph shows the total market capitalization for the top seven cryptocurrencies excluding Bitcoin: Here, Ethereum and Ripple can be seen gaining more and more market share of the entire cryptocurrency market: 3.Enterprises are pouring in: Technology corporations and financial institutions didn’t wait for the VCs to come and adopted their solutions for blockchain-based decentralized networks. Among tech giants, leaders Microsoft and Intel have been pushing blockchain agendas for internal use among their customers, which are mainly big companies. Earlier this week, Intel and Microsoft joined forces to launch Coco, a blockchain framework for business that processes about 1,600 transactions per second, 1000X more than comparable blockchain frameworks, such as Ethereum consortium. The new platform uses Ethereum-based smart contracts and enables confidentiality and security over the network with the aid of other distributed ledger systems. With Coco, fashion retailers, for example, might form a blockchain consortium to verify authentic designer merchandise, and track delivery, payments, and stock inventory. Earlier in 2015, Microsoft announced a cloud-based blockchain developer environment for Azure, its cloud platform. Since then, the company has partnered with numerous blockchain technologies such as HyperLedger Fabric, R3 Corda, Quorum, Chain Core, and BlockApps. Competitor Amazon made a similar move, partnering with blockchain investment firm Digital Currency Group to offer an experimentation environment for startups and developers and partnering with a few blockchain companies on its AWS cloud platform. Google too is in the game, although not directly, investing through its VC in Ripple, the third largest cryptocurrency after Bitcoin and Ethereum, and in Blockchain, a bitcoin wallet startup. At least two large-scale blockchain projects are permissioned by global enterprises: Open-source project Hyperledger, established by the Linux Foundation, is partnered with Intel, J.P Morgan, SAP, Fujitsu, Accenture, Daimler, and R3. Many of these organizations are also a part of the Ethereum Alliance, with the addition of enterprises such as Microsoft, BBVA, Credit Suisse and more. So, to sum up, why are VCs so afraid of blockchain? There are quite a few reasons for this: Fear of the impact ICOs have on traditional VC business: VCs have sustained many threats, from family offices taking up innovation, crowdfunding, and private equity firms digging into investing in startups directly. But never has the danger been so clear and imminent as with ICOs. In the long term, ICOs as a funding vehicle for start-ups could rival the traditional VC model. Blockchain tokens issued by start-ups during an ICO are a more liquid asset than any stock in a private company held by VCs. In the current situation, venture capital funds are an illiquid asset class, and they have to wait 7-10 years to realize their results and measure the IRR. But blockchain tokens are immediate and can disclose a company’s momentum in real time. Naturally, VCs would feel suspicious regarding a real-time investment model that challenges them. Also, ICO might bring to the table another new kind of investor, making deals less exclusive than what they used to be, on a scale that crowdfunding hasn’t done yet. On the other hand, this will demand disclosure by startups of performance indicators in the public domain. In that way, GPs and LPs will have a clearer idea of the performance of their portfolio. Inability to separate blockchain as an infrastructure for businesses from Bitcoin and ICOs: Blockchain is a technology concept that can turn over industries. It is a secured and distributed electronic ledger, which allows all transactions – such as payments, loans, and contracts- to be tracked in real time. Bitcoin is a coin that can be used for digital transactions, and ICOs are a method for raising money using the offering of digital coin based tokens. Most VCs will not even go so far as understanding these nuances, not to mention acting rationally upon each of these sectors. Inconvenient Regulation: Last month the SEC declared blockchain tokens to be considered securities, rather than assets. This decision puts the U.S in an inferior position relative to countries such as Switzerland and Singapore that treat blockchain tokens as assets. In order to attract investors and make the ICO process easier, U.S blockchain companies might list in those countries, or else use regulation S and D exemptions with the SEC in order to raise funds. That limits American funding to a mere 99 accredited investors, but does not limit global investments. Few exits and high rate of failure: As an immature discipline, Bitcoin and blockchain companies not only have a poor history of exits, but also a high rate of failure. According to research focused on cryptocurrency investments listed on the Coindesk database, 14% of a total number of VC-backed blockchain and Bitcoin companies went bankrupt or were sold in a fire sale. 85% of them were focused on Bitcoin. The numerous M&As in the business mainly concentrated around Bitcoin exchanges, and do not seem to be related to VCs. Blockchain was unscalable and not business oriented until recently: Putting aside cryptocurrency mining, which consumes a lot of energy, blockchain frameworks are not efficient enough for business applications. Ethereum, for example, processes around 16 transactions per second. However, Microsoft has recently showcased a blockchain framework that processes 1,600 transactions per second. Inability to create a monopoly: Investor Peter Thiel once said that “entrepreneurs starting a company should aim for monopoly and avoid competition.” However, the idea behind blockchain, a decentralized and public network, is intolerant to monopolies. Investing in ICO is still dangerous: In the current situation, direct investment in ICOs entails perils for VCs besides regulation. This includes a complicated process of cashing out (of a digital coin), currency’s high volatility, the high cost of capital in due diligence, and a reduced defensibility in the case of a large investment, according to a paper by Lerer Hippeau investment firm. How Can VCs Get Involved with Blockchain? It might be a little too late for VCs to join the blockchain revolution. The original early stage cherry-picking model of VCs calls for identifying a revolutionary technology before anyone else, rather than jumping on an already moving wagon. In addition to traditional equity investment in blockchain-oriented companies, VCs can act prudently, starting with new and creative formations. For instance, they can raise blockchain dedicated funds or hedge funds, re-contracting their LPs regarding the new rules of the game, such as raising a part of the fund through ICO or investing in liquidated securities such as cryptocurrency tokens. Another option is to invest in the economy created by an ICO, or in its token adoption, rather than buying tokens in the ICO itself. This can be done by providing money, real estate, computing power, guidance or support to developers that are building on top of the blockchain protocol. We at coin.best provide unbiased ICO reviews through an objective analysis and rating system, allowing blockchain investors to better understand the ICO market
This is a continuation of Part 1. PSEUDONYMITY Unlike credit card transactions, in which you give your name, Bitcoin transactions are pseudonymous (a pseudonym being an identifier other than your real name). Instead of having your name on your account, you have a public key, which is just a sequence of letters and numbers, like the one below. 3J98t1WpEZ73CNmQviecrnyiWrnqRhWNLy That's your pseudonym. People who are concerned with privacy view this as an advantage, since it enables you to make payments without revealing your identity. Critics worry that this system facilitates crime, and proponents counter that cash is much better for criminals. Why? Your account may be represented by some random sequence, instead of your name, but all Bitcoin transactions that have ever occurred are available for scrutiny on a public ledger called the blockchain. This data opens up the possibility of investigative methods to which cash is not susceptible. Also, those who are concerned about criminals may be missing the point. It's sort of like censors in the mid-twentieth century who hadn't conceived of the World Wide Web (preventing kids from being exposed to profanity these days is a bit more difficult, to say the least). The thing they're missing is that Bitcoin is only one of many cryptocurrencies, and others (such as zerocoin) are being developed that will provide much greater privacy. File sharing on the internet is another example of how those seeking to overregulate Bitcoin might be missing the point. Early on, we had Napster, which was shut down due to concerns over copyright infringement. The effect of this shutdown appears to have been essentially the opposite of the intended effect. Instead of stopping illegal file sharing, it accelerated the development of file-sharing technologies that were even more difficult to stop. Since demand still existed, Kazaa came to the fore, and now we have BitTorrent. It's "hard to put the genie back in the bottle," as Ben Lawsky, New York's Superintendent of Financial Services, has pointed out. When it comes to reducing crime, overregulation of Bitcoin could lead to an increased resistance to law-enforcement efforts, as we saw with file-sharing, while at the same time taking away from its many benefits. THREATS TO BITCOIN'S SUCCESS When evaluating Bitcoin's chances for success or trying to understand price fluctuations, it's important to keep several key issues in mind. ADOPTION Both merchant and consumer adoption are important, and both have been growing. On the merchant side, we now have large reputable companies accepting Bitcoin, such as Overstock.com, Expedia, and Dish Network. See, for example, the list of companies working with Coinbase. On the consumer side, one way to track growth is to look at the number of bitcoin wallets (wallets are to Bitcoin what accounts are to the traditional banking system). This number has also been growing steadily. The website http://www.bitcoinpulse.com/ is one place to track such things. Another interesting thing to watch will be the MIT Bitcoin Giveaway, in which $100 in bitcoins will be given to every MIT undergraduate in the fall 2014 semester. ROBUSTNESS OF THE TECHNOLOGY One possible threat is that some kind of bug or design flaw will cause the system to crash. The technology has been around since 2009, and Bitcoin has been resilient so far. For example, it survived a distributed denial of service attack early this year. There are a number of design issues to consider, such as scalability, mining centralization, and so forth, but there are a lot of people working on these issues. In fact, Bitcoin is considered by some to be supported by the largest research and development community in the world. Something like 10,000 of the smartest people in the world are working on issues such as scalability and user-friendliness. COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES There is a chance that another technology that is superior to Bitcoin will emerge to kill it. At present, however, Bitcoin is the clear leader among cryptocurrencies, and it becomes more difficult to overtake as time passes, due to the network effect. Already, Bitcoin is supported by a massive amount of infrastructure, in the form of mining equipment, exchanges, startup companies backed by venture capitalists like Andreessen Horowitz, software applications, and so forth. REGULATION There is some chance that governments could slow the growth of the Bitcoin economy, for example by issuing regulations that make it difficult for exchanges to operate. Regulations in China led to a sharp decrease in the price for a time. Many governments have reacted more favorably. In the U.S., the regulatory outlook has been improving. We've seen increased clarity from the IRS and are expecting favorable regulations to come out of New York sometime this month, which may make it easier for exchanges to get established in New York. This could lead to more liquidity and would reduce the risk of shock from one exchange going down. Moreover, the U.S. just sold about 18 million dollars' worth of seized bitcoins in an auction, which provides additional legitimacy to the currency. A FINAL NOTE: SOCIAL AND POLITICAL RAMIFICATIONS For better or worse, one thing large-scale technologies seem to have in common is their unpredictability. Who would have predicted that a social media platform called Twitter with a cute little bird logo would end up facilitating political revolutions throughout the Arab world? FURTHER RESOURCES This article by Marc Andreessen gives a good overview. A nice way to get started is also to just check out bitcoin regularly. The users here range from noobs to developers and Bitcoin entrepreneurs. So, you’ll see more technical talk and in depth discussion than you see in typical media stories, and you can ask if you don’t understand. You can also try the Bitcoin 101 Blackboard Series, which I hear is quite good. For a quick video on the technical aspects of Bitcoin, you can try the video Bitcoin Under the Hood or the shorter, less technical version of this video. For another explanation of the technical underpinnings, you might try the Khan Academy videos. If you're looking to purchase your first bitcoin, then depending on where in the world you live, you might consider getting started with Coinbase. It's reputable and very easy to use. Many people will advise you not to store your coins on a web wallet, but buying a few coins (or a fraction of a coin) on Coinbase is a good way to start as a beginner. Please be aware, though, that this is a new industry and purchasing Bitcoin in any form carries risk, so do your research. I wouldn't want to be the one recommending Coinbase just before someone manages to hack it! I hope that helps! Edit: formatting and typos; added quote from Ben Lawsky.
Bitcoin is moving from its Deceptive phase to a very Disruptive phase. This Blog is going to explain why, and what you may want to do. I've been tracking Bitcoin since its inception, and my confidence has grown to the point where I'm now trading in a portion of my gold holdings for bitcoin, buying it and accepting bitcoin for the Abundance 360 CEO Summit. What exactly is bitcoin? For starters, bitcoin is a digital currency. As of right now, one bitcoin is equivalent to about $600 USD. Bitcoin is divisible down to 8 decimal places, or 0.00000001 BTC. You can buy things with bitcoin, sell things for bitcoin, and exchange bitcoin for other currencies (and vice versa). You can also "mine" it, but we'll get into that later. At its core, bitcoin is a smart currency, designed by very forward-thinking engineers. It eliminates the need for banks, gets rid of credit card fees, currency exchange fees, money transfer fees, and reduces the need for lawyers in transitions... all good things. Most importantly, it is an "exponential currency" that will change the way we think about money. Much the same way email changed the way we thought of mail. (Can you remember life before email?) If you've followed my work, or participated in my Abundance 360 Summit, you understand that I teach and track exponential technologies using my "6 D's" approach, looking for "user interface moments." Bitcoin is following the 6Ds and is on a path to go from deceptive to disruptive over the next 1 - 3 years. Allow me to explain. Why Bitcoin is following the 6 D's
DIGITIZED: Bitcoin is digitized money -- it is a global, purely digital currency. Every bitcoin is traded, earned, sold, exchanged and bought in cyberspace. For this reason, it is living on Moore's law and hopping on the exponential curve.
DECEPTIVE: Bitcoin software was released to the public in 2009 and for the first few years has been growing in its deceptive phase. Few heard about it, few used it and accepted it. In addition, the currency has been hard to use; therefore, it hasn't had its "User Interface Moment" (the key transition from deceptive to disruptive). More soon.
DISRUPTIVE: As described below by my friend Barry Silbert (founder of Second Market), Bitcoin is about to enter its disruptive phase where its rate of acceptance and use will explode, as will its value. See below.
DEMATERIALIZING: Bitcoin is eliminating or dematerializing the use of physical money (bills and coins), even credit cards. But more than that, it is also dematerializing (read: eliminating) the need for central banks, lawyers and currency exchanges.
DEMONETIZING: Bitcoin eliminates middlemen (banks, lawyers, exchanges) and demonetizes the cost of transactions. No fees. It makes it cheaper to use, spread and share money.
DEMOCRATIZING: Bitcoin makes access to capital available to everyone, where there are no banks, no ATMs and no credit card suppliers. Ultimately, as we move (over the next 6 years) to a world of 7 billion digitally connected humans, Bitcoin makes currency available to anyone with a connection to the internet.
Bitcoin's Evolution - Why it will be Disruptive Soon My friend Barry Silbert (founder of Second Market) recently spoke as my guest at Singularity University's Exponential Finance conference about Bitcoin. He provided an excellent overview of its near-term trajectory, summarized below. His input has also put me on the lookout for the "User Interface Moment" - that moment in time when an entrepreneur designs a piece of interface software (think Marc Andreessen and Mosaic) that makes it so easy to use bitcoin. I'll be reporting on those user interfaces, investing in those startups and helping to promote them. Okay, now back to Barry Silbert's insights. Barry outlined five phases for this digital currency that help explain where it's been and where it's going. Phase 1: The period 2009 to 2011 was the early 'experimentation phase' for bitcoin (i.e. deceptive). Here the software is released to public and most technologists and hackers started playing with the code. During this phase, there was no apparent value to currency yet; mining bitcoin was easy and could be done by a single person on a MacBook or PC. Phase 2: 2011 marked the beginning of the 'early adopter' phase (still deceptive). There was a lot of early hype and press around Silk Road (where you could buy drugs). The value went from less than $1 to over $30, then crashed. This spurs the first generation of bitcoin companies to build basic infrastructure: wallets, merchant processors, mining operations, exchanges, etc. - i.e. the early user interfaces. Phase 3: 2012 thru mid-2014 marked the beginning of the 'Venture Capital Phase.' Folks like Marc Andreessen, Google Ventures, Benchmark and others have begun investing in Generation 2 Bitcoin companies. We are right in the middle of Phase 3 right now. Thousands of bitcoin companies are getting funding. Many of these are trying to create the "User-Interface Moment." Phase 4: Fall 2014 thru 2015 will like see the start of the Wall Street Phase. Here we will begin to see institutional money acknowledging digital currencies as an asset class, and they will begin trading it, investing it and creating products around it. This marks the start of the disruptive phase. Phase 5: Finally will come the 'Mass Global Consumer Adoption' phase -- this is where bitcoin becomes a major player in the global economy. When consumers feel it is easy, safe and secure to use bitcoin. It won't be possible until after the "User Interface Moment" materializes, but I believe, as does Barry, that this is only 1-2 years out. So now what? Learn, do, teach... Go experiment! Create a bitcoin wallet and buy some bitcoin. There is no better way to learn than by doing. First, there are a few bitcoin exchanges where you can "buy" bitcoins with dollars (or other currencies). The most popular exchanges are: Coinbase (www.coinbase.com) Bitpay (www.bitpay.com) For those of you in my Abundance 360 Community, we will be discussing bitcoin in more detail. We will talk about how they work, how you start investing, how you mine, how you get involved, how to create a wallet, and how to begin acquiring bitcoin. If you aren't a member yet, join us here: http://www.a360.com Best of luck, Peter
Article text: Web Pioneer Keeps Faith, and Cash, in Bitcoin
March 21, 2014 7:13 p.m. ET Internet pioneer Marc Andreessen is doubling down on bitcoin amid turbulence in the virtual-currency world, in a bet that widespread adoption of the currency will fuel the growth of new businesses and technologies. Venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, where Mr. Andreessen is a co-founder and partner, has made about $50 million of investments in the area—believed to be more than any other firm—from a $1.5 billion fund, the firm says. The Palo Alto, Calif., firm plans to invest hundreds of millions of additional dollars over the next few years from other funds, people familiar with the firm say. Bitcoin investor and Netscape co-founder Marc Andreessen. Bloomberg News Mr. Andreessen says he is convinced of the bright outlook for digital currencies despite setbacks such as the collapse last month of Tokyo-based Mt. Gox, one of the most prominent bitcoin exchanges, which said it lost hundreds of millions of dollars worth of the virtual currency. "I'm completely unfazed and plan to invest more," he said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. The move exposes Mr. Andreessen, best known for co-founding Netscape Communications more than two decades ago, and his investors to greater risks amid uncertainty over the future of bitcoin. The currency isn't backed by a government but recently has become popular among technology enthusiasts, trading at various times over the past year for less than $100 and more than $1,100. It traded Friday at around $580. For all of Mr. Andreessen's enthusiasm, some bitcoin fans aren't thrilled with the interest by venture capitalists and worry about the encroachment of big business. Bitcoin allows users to transfer money—or other items, like legal contracts—without an intermediary such as a bank. "You've got a bunch of bitcoiners and young libertarians who don't have enough confidence and life experience," says Cody Wilson, a founder of Dark Wallet, which seeks to enhance anonymity within digital-currency networks. "So they are being lulled into the [venture capitalist] set in California and New York. There's just not enough confidence to go against the grain and question the whole goddamn thing." And there is skepticism among other investors. "For 99% of people, bitcoin doesn't solve any problem they have," says Bradley Golding, a managing director at New York investment firm Christofferson, Robb & Co., which specializes in investing in financial companies and has decided not to invest in bitcoin-related companies. "Most people are comfortable going to their bank, making a deposit and using a credit card…It's a solution in search of a problem." WSJD is the Journal's home for tech news, analysis and product reviews. Turkey Wants Videos Off YouTube, Google Says No Only 11% of Twitter Users in 2012 Are Still Tweeting Turkey's President Joins in Breaching the Ban on Twitter White House May Case BlackBerry Aside Airbnb's Funding Talks Value It at $10 Billion Initially, Mr. Andreessen and his partners at Andreessen Horowitz were skeptical the world of virtual currencies held attractive investments. Even if they could discover ways to bet on the area, Mr. Andreessen figured it would be a challenge gaining the support of the firm's investors, including institutions such as Princeton University and the Ford Foundation. Further muddying the picture for some conservative investors, many fans of these digital currencies were eager to replace governments and other institutions, and some proponents seemed to rely on digital currencies to enable unlawful activities. By last April, however, Mr. Andreessen decided it was time to approach his firm's investors about bitcoin. He waited until the end of an annual meeting of Andreessen Horowitz's advisory board at the Rosewood Sand Hill hotel in Menlo Park, Calif., to broach the idea. "At first blush, you're going to think we're out of our minds," Mr. Andreessen says he told the group of five investment firms on the Andreessen Horowitz advisory board, "but we're going to invest in a fake mathematical currency." The comment met with stone-cold silence, before a brief discussion ensued. Some investors seemed intrigued, but many had little idea what bitcoin was. Ultimately, Mr. Andreessen said investor resistance was less than he feared. Venture-capital firms have free rein to make almost any kind of investment. Their investors generally anticipate about half the investments will be losers, while some others will be home runs. So far, Andreessen Horowitz has invested $25 million in Coinbase, which creates digital wallets, and a smaller amount in Ripple, a payment system, among other investments, according to Andreessen Horowitz. Along the way, Mr. Andreessen has become one of bitcoin's leading evangelists, writing frequent articles and blog posts about the possibilities of digital currencies. This month, Mr. Andreessen sent Twitter messages calling bitcoin an "important tech breakthrough." He said that "the ideas stand on their own, the math stands on its own, the code stands on its own." Bitcoin was developed in late 2008 by a person or group called Satoshi Nakamoto. It is an electronic currency that doesn't exist in a physical form. Bitcoin is created by "miners'' as payment for verifying bitcoin transactions using a complicated mathematical algorithm, a process that requires intense computing power. Mr. Andreessen says bitcoin reminds him of the early days of the Internet. "I'm having déjà vu," Mr. Andreessen says. Bitcoin is "weird and scary and nerdy, and it's full of scams and frauds, just like the Internet was." Still, Mr. Andreessen says it took him years to appreciate the business possibilities. He recalls reading an academic paper in 2009 about the launch of the bitcoin software, which seemed to improve on past related work, such as DigiCash, invented in 1990. "I'm not a serious mathematician, but I know a lot of really good mathematicians and computer scientists and reached out to them," he says. Throughout 2010 and 2011, Mr. Andreessen discussed bitcoin's development with Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and others but still didn't think it was an appropriate investment. Over time, Mr. Andreessen became convinced virtual currencies would enable a huge number of productive endeavors, raising intriguing investment possibilities that he and his colleagues hadn't considered. If an Internet user can transfer digital contracts, signatures, money or other property in a secure fashion, while avoiding the hefty fees of intermediaries such as banks and credit-card companies, bitcoin and other digital currencies will gain mainstream popularity, he says. When Mr. Andreessen realized more participants would adopt virtual currencies, which in turn would lead to more acceptance, he decided his firm had to act. "I realized it's a four-sided network effect—users, merchants, miners, developers," he says. By last spring, it was time to approach Andreessen Horowitz's investors. Over lunch a few weeks after Mr. Andreessen's embrace of bitcoin at the Andreessen Horowitz meeting, Elizabeth Obershaw, a managing director at Horsley Bridge, a San Francisco firm that invests in Andreessen Horowitz, returned to the idea. "Tell me about that little teaser," Mr. Obershaw, whose interest had been piqued, asked Mr. Andreessen. Mr. Andreessen began explaining his firm's interest to Ms. Obershaw and other investors. "I was skeptical," says Andrew Golden, president of the Princeton University Investment Company, which manages the university's endowment and invests in Andreessen Horowitz. But, he says, "This was a smart team telling us we need to look at it in a different way." Like the Internet, bitcoin will emerge as an accepted technology, Mr. Andreessen argues, as it becomes more regulated and consumers and businesses become more comfortable with the idea of digital currencies. With those changes, he predicts, the subversive politics often associated with the currency will fade. "We like fringe technologies but not fringe politics," he says. —Michael J. Casey contributed to this article. Write to Gregory Zuckerman at [email protected]
Reporte Semanal #2 Julio 2015 I Análisis de Mercado de Bitex.la
Durante la última semana la moneda digital operó la franja entre 292.79 USD y 272.74 USD. Podemos observar en el grafico que el precio tuvo una leve tendencia a la baja de manera lateralizada pero nunca rompiendo el soporte de los 270 USD. Podemos esperar que esta semana el Bitcoin se mantenga en este nivel de precios, de romper la resistencia de 290 USD podría experimentar una suba mantenida hasta el nivel de los 310 USD. https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/1123/1*k-M1-0_MOgIter_AP0ov-Q.jpeg Con más de 800 millones de dólares invertidos en Bitcoin y tecnología Blockchain en nuevas empresas desde 2012, es seguro decir que los capitalistas de riesgo han sin duda sido cautivados. Las inversiones en la industria ya han superado el total acumulado para el 2014, con más de $ 380 millones comprometidos a nuevas empresas en las rondas de financiación anunciadas públicamente este año. Mientras que de por si es una cifra impresionante, lo que ese número representa es la cantidad de semillas a las empresas en última etapa que están haciendo apuestas sobre la nueva ola de innovadores con el objetivo de tomar al bitcoin y la tecnología blockchain por delante. Los Datos de Bitcoin VC de CoinDesk indican que cerca de 200 empresas de capital riesgo han invertido en empresas Bitcoin, un total que excluye a los muchos inversores individuales y que han participado en las rondas de financiación públicas, así como las diversas ofertas privadas mantenidas fuera de la vista del público. Fuera de estas muchas empresas de inversión, sin embargo, los líderes claros son aquellos cuyos acuerdos de inversión e ideales han influido en el ecosistema más amplio. Con esto en mente, hemos compilado una lista de 10 de las empresas de inversión más influyentes y visibles en la industria. IDG Capital Partners: La única entidad no estadounidense de la lista, de China IDG Capital ha surgido como un inversionista temprano, aún conservador, con un mayor énfasis en las aplicaciones de la blockchain como un libro distribuido. La primera inversión de IDG se produjo durante su 05 2013 financiación de Ripple Labs, un proveedor de protocolo de pagos distribuido que ha recaudado $ 37 millones en total y recientemente cerró $ 28 millones de la Serie A. Más tarde, participó con 1 millón de dólares de recaudación en fondos de Koinify. Originalmente concebido como un pedal de arranque descentralizado, Koinify desde entonces ha anunciado que tiene previsto girar como resultado de los ingresos no sostenibles. Aunque la empresa parece preferir las inversiones en tecnología distribuida de libro mayor, IDG, no obstante ha respaldado uno de los mayores proveedores de servicios de Bitcoin, con sede en el Círculo Financiero de Boston, después de haber participado con 50 millones de dólares de la Serie C del Círculo en abril. Un representante de IDG Ventures, EE.UU. indicó que la empresa está actualmente buscando oportunidades en fase inicial, mientras que su contraparte con sede en China se centra en ofertas de la última etapa. Khosla Ventures: Descrito por TechCrunch como una “entidad de capital riesgo mega”, con sede en Menlo Park Khosla Ventures, recientemente recaudó $ 400m para financiar su siguiente lote de inversiones semilla, algunas de las cuales pueden llegar a ser dedicadas a Bitcoin o empresas blockchain. Khosla ha tenido una posición reservada con respecto al Bitcoin , la blockchain y a si su tesis de inversión favorece una o la otra. Sin embargo, eso no ha impedido su participación en algunos de las la financiaciónes mas renombradas del espacio. La Cartera bitcoin de Khosla incluye la industria de recaudación de fondos líder 21 Inc, que ha acumulado más de $ 120 millones en capital inicial hasta la fecha, así como la mayor obra de tecnología del sector Blockstream. En otros lugares, Khosla ha respaldado rondas de financiación más pequeñas para el proveedor de tecnología blockchain, Cadena y servicios financieros BlockScore. VC Boost: San Mateo Boost VC puede estar alejado de un enfoque específico en bitcoin (recientemente anunciando que su clase más nueva sería igualmente dedicada a la realidad virtual), pero desde su creación en 2013, ha sido uno de los inversores más prolíficos en el espacio. Boost VC ha declarado que pretende respaldar 100 empresas bitcoin en 2017, y ya cuenta con una cartera que incluye nuevas empresas con potencial de crecimiento, incluyendo Align Commerce, BlockCypher, BTCPoint, BitPagos and Reveal. Dado que la mayoría de sus inversiones son en las primeras etapas, es difícil evaluar plenamente el énfasis de Boost en el volumen de su enfoque en el ecosistema. AME Cloud Ventures: El fondo de start-ups fundado por el fundador de Yahoo, Jerry Yang, AME Cloud Ventures, ha surgido como otro inversor prudente y poco frecuente en la industria bitcoin. La compañía con sede en Palo Alto cuenta con tres de las startups mejor financiadas en su cartera hasta la fecha — BitPay, Blockstream, Ripple Labs, así como Blockcypher y el solucionador de identidad para blockchain Shocard. Lightspeed Venture Partners Aunque Lightspeed ha ralentizado sin duda el ritmo de sus inversiones en la tecnología, la sociedad de capital riesgo fue uno de sus primeros y más vocales partidarias, con el socio Jeremy Liew expresando públicamente su entusiasmo por la tecnología ya en 2013 y que aparece como testigo en las audiencias de Bitlicense en 2014. En general, Lightspeed ha realizado una inversión interesante en un arsenal de bitcoin y empresas blockchain ya sea directamente o a través de sus filiales. Sin embargo, Lightspeed se trasladó más decididamente en octubre 2014 con copias de una ronda de financiación de $ 30.5m para un proveedor de wallets de bitcoin en Blockchain. La financiación, la más grande en el espacio, podría decirse que establece el escenario para rondas aún más grandes en la parte superior de 2015. Ribbit capital Sin embargo, otra firma de riesgo que ha liderado el pensamiento en la inversión para el ecosistema de la tecnología es Ribbit capital. Lanzada en 2013, la firma VC fue una de las primeras en interesarse en el espacio, con el fundador de Micky Malka uniendose a la Fundación Bitcoin. Aunque entusiasta, Ribbit ha sido igualmente paciente con las copias de algunos de los mayores rondas de financiación del ecosistema, incluidos los de Blockstream, BTCJam, Coinbase, Ripple laboratorios y XAPO. Union Square Ventures, Impulsado por el socio Fred Wilson, Union Square Ventures (USV) ha sido uno de los más comprometidos en el diálogo público sobre la tecnología. Liberal con sus alabanzas, sin embargo, USV ha sido conservador con sus fondos. Hasta la fecha, USV ha realizado inversiones en sólo tres empresas Bitcoin y blockchain —La firma de servicios Bitcoin, Coinbase, la red de comercio descentralizado OpenBazaar y la de código abierto del protocolo de identidad OneName. Las inversiones, aparentemente dispares, sin embargo, sugieren una de las tesis más bien definidas entre las principales empresas de capital de riesgo. USV cree en explorar si el explosivo crecimiento permitido por el protocolo bitcoin se podría aplicar a las verticales más allá de las finanzas en lugar de las inversiones en el ecosistema de apoyo de bitcoin. RRE Ventures, Otra firma no tan pública con respecto a los elogios a la tecnología, RRE ha añadido una impresionante lista de compañías Bitcoin a su cartera. Comenzando con el intercambio bitcoin ITbit en 2013, RRE ha invertido ya en la empresa minera bitcoin 21 Inc; y al procesador de pagos BitPay; Especialistas en API Gem; proveedores de la cartera de hardware del caso; Mirror y Ripple Labs. Tal vez su inversión más notable, sin embargo, es en la firma de tecnología blockchain Chain, la cual es liderada por el CEO y socio de RRE Adam Ludwin. Las inversiones de RRE son dignas de mención dada su variedad, aunque la mayoría de estas nuevas empresas se centran en los aspectos fundamentales del ecosistema bitcoin, ya se trate de pagos de máquina a máquina o contratos inteligentes basados en la blockchain. Sin embargo, estas inversiones podrían llegar a formar sólo una fracción de lo que se viene para la empresa, ya que ha recaudado $ 1.5bn en más de siete fondos desde su fundación en 1994. Digital Currency Group (Antes Bitcoin Opportunity Corp) BitFlyer, BitPay, BitPesa, BitGo, BitNet, BitPremier, BitX — estos son sólo algunos de los startups Bitcoin que usan un prefijo «bit» y respaldados por Barry Silbert Bitcoin Oportunity Corp. Recientemente rebautizado como Digital Coin Group (DCG), el fondo de Silbert ha sido uno de los inversores más activos, tanto personalmente como a través de DCG, con nombres importantes, como Coinbase, Circle y Ripple labs de redondeo a cabo su cartera de 35 empresas. Andreessen Horowitz Quizás indiscutiblemente el de más alto perfil que participa en el ecosistema bitcoin ha sido Andreessen Horowitz, la firma de capital privado lanzada por el fundador de Netscape Marc Andreessen y gerente de producto de Netscape Ben Horowitz. Tras su participación en abril de 2013 en la ronda de inversión de Ripple Lab, Andreessen Horowitz se movio agresivamente para ayudar a desarrollar y cultivar los dos startups mejor financiados de la industria, Coinbase y 21 Inc, que representan $ 227 millones en inversión total o más de $ 1 en $ 4 hasta ahora invertido en la industria. Andreessen Horowitz también ha visto al socio general Balaji Srinivasan asumir un papel activo en el desarrollo de 21 cuando asumió un puesto de consejero delegado de la compañía en mayo. La compañía también ha participado en las rondas de inversión más pequeños para TradeBlock y OpenBazaar. Uno de los mayores bancos de Francia está buscando contratar a un desarrollador con enfoque en bitcoin. Société Générale (SocGen) publicó un listado de trabajo el 2 de julio para una “TI desarrollador en Bitcoin, blockchains y cryptocurrencies”. SocGen es el tercer banco francés en términos de activos, reportando $ 1,3bn en activos en 2014. El contrato de 12 meses, de acuerdo con el post, seria de investigación y desarrollo en cryptocurrencies y blockchain. Aunque no hay detalles, el mensaje indica que el banco está tratando de desarrollar software en la empresa, citando “la programación de prototipos”. SocGen no respondió de inmediato a una solicitud de comentarios. Las responsabilidades que se enumeran a la posición incluyen: “Como VIE, tendrá las siguientes funciones y responsabilidades: Programación en C # / C ++ / Python / Otros contra bitcoin, altcoin, diferentes APIs altchain blockchain, el desarrollo de una prueba de concepto en cualquier idioma / protocolos utilizados en los protocolos criptomoneda y blockchains 1,0–3,0; corriendo estadísticas contra blockchains y formas de ingeniería para recopilar información cuantitativa sobre lo que realmente sucede en el mundo de las criptomonedas “. La posición también requiere la organización de informes internos, presentaciones del personal y programas de capacitación. El VIE tendrá la tarea de “comprometerse con la comunidad FinTech y la recopilación de información sobre el sector de la cripto-moneda en Londres y en otros lugares.” Bitcoin es la zona de mayor crecimiento en la inversión de Start-ups desde mediados de 2012, afirmo un capitalista de riesgo de Redpoint. En su reciente análisis de datos Mattermark, Tomasz Tunguz señaló que la inversión en empresas Bitcoin — seguido de cerca por las Sharing-Photos y las startups de almacenamiento físico — ha crecido un 151% en los últimos tres años. Sin embargo, Tunguz señalo que las startups Bitcoin representan una “fracción minúscula” del total invertido de los fondos —al recibir apenas el 0,18% de la financiación total de el último año. La inversión de capital de riesgo en el sector bancario sólo ha crecido un 65% desde mediados de 2012, pero el sector ha recibido una cuota de 1,85% del número total de dólares invertidos en los últimos doce meses. Redpoint, que ha financiado 434 empresas hasta la fecha cuenta con empresas en todas las áreas de desarrollo(temprano, medio y tardío) Las afirmaciones de Tunguz siguen la publicación del Estado de CoinDesk del Informe Bitcoin (SOB) para el Q2 de 2015, que encontró que la inversión total de capital riesgo en el espacio de la moneda digital fue en aumento, señalando un aumento del 21% a US $ 832m. Un portavoz del ING Group ha aclarado que sus clientes son capaces de comprar a bitcoin a traves de cuentas bancarias de la empresa, a pesar de las declaraciones contradictorias de uno de sus representantes en los medios sociales. Los estados siguen un período de especulación sobre las políticas de la banca y los servicios financieros de la empresa multinacional holandesa ING siguiendo la afirmación de que estaba bloqueando las compras de bitcoin a las cuentas de los usuarios. Un portavoz de la compañía indicó ayer que no era posible para los usuarios de ING intentar adquirir bitcoin usando sus cuentas debido al “mayor riesgo de fraude” asociado a las transacciones. Esa declaración se retractó mas tarde en declaraciones a Coindesk: “Nuestra política bitcoin, es muy simple, los clientes de ING pueden comprar bitcoins con su cuenta bancaria ING.” Representantes de la compañía en Twitter también han puesto en claro el asunto. No obstante, los comentarios son algunas de las primeras declaraciones de ING en cuanto a su política del bitcoin, a pesar de que se había dirigido previamente el tema en sus materiales corporativos. ING cuenta con 32 millones de clientes privados e institucionales, ganando € 1,3 mil millones en la banca minorista y € 739 millones de sus actividades de banca comercial en el 1er trimestre de 2015. Compra Bitcoin en Pesos en nuestra sucursal. Ya puedes comprar Bitcoin al mejor precio de mercado utilizando las nuevas sucursales de Bitex.la en Buenos Aires y Santiago de Chile . Acércate con tu código personal BITEX y tu DNI, Cédula o Pasaporte y en menos de una hora tienes el saldo acreditado en tu cuenta para comprar bitcoin. Encontra nuestras sucursales! Nos pueden encontrar en: https://bitex.la http://facebook.com/bitex.la http://twitter.com/bitexla https://plus.google.com/+bitexla https://instagram.com/bitex.la https://bitexla.tumblr.com Visita Bitex.la ¿Qué es Bitex.la? Bitex.la es un mercado de compra y venta de Bitcoin lider en Latino America. La plataforma permite operar bitcoin de manera profesional contra dolares americanos. Cuenta con una robusta red financiera que permite a los usuarios operar casi desde cualquier país del mundo sin restricciones. ¿Queres aprender sobre bitcoin? Estamos lanzando un nuevo espacio educativo sobre el bitcoin de una manera simple y amistosa. Si tienes dudas o quieres aportar de alguna manera nos podes contactar en cualquier momento. Visitanos!
Marc Andreessen and Balaji Srinivasan, two of bitcoin’s biggest bulls in the venture capital industry, stepped up their rhetoric against skeptics of the crypto-currency today at the Coin Summit ... Marc Andreessen on Cryptocurrency January 4, 2020 Crypto Videos Marc Andreessen is a entrepreneur and investor Marc Andreessen has long been on the cutting edge of crypto, and this year he extended his stake in the … Thetell Blog Marc Andreessen: We may build a bitcoin portfolio Last Updated: March 25, 2014 at 2:44 p.m. ET First Published: March 25, 2014 at 9:20 a.m. ET After famed dealmaker Warren Buffett warned investors to stay away from Bitcoin, calling it "a mirage," venture capitalist (and Bitcoin investor) Marc Andreessen called him an "old white man ... Cryptocurrency reviews and scores by Marc Andreessen, Cofounder and General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz, on Bitcoin: Created by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in 2009, Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
I like Bitcoin and a16z so I put together all 25 of @pmarca's tweets from his BTC storm January 5th 2015. See more at http://steveiq.com/ Enjoy. Bitcoin In Their Own Words: Marc Andreessen Full Interview: Bitcoin Fireside Chat with Marc Andreessen and Balaji Srinivasan (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Sheryl Sandberg and Marc Andreessen on the Future of Mobile, Income Inequality, and Tech Trends - Duration: 41:36. Fortune Magazine 19,584 views Marc Andreessen on Change, Constraints, and Curiosity - Duration: 54 ... The Ballet wallet controversy, Gold Bitcoin flippening, 2020 halving, China - Duration: 50:13. BitcoinMeister 696 views. 50 ... Following the premiere of the Bitcoin Basics Workshop, Andreas will be hosting a livestream Q&A session to answer questions about the workshop. Tune in as soon as the premiere ends, right here!